Free The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason Books Online
Identify Epithetical Books The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
Title | : | The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason |
Author | : | Sam Harris |
Book Format | : | Paperback |
Book Edition | : | Anniversary Edition |
Pages | : | Pages: 348 pages |
Published | : | September 17th 2005 by W. W. Norton Company (first published 2004) |
Categories | : | Religion. Nonfiction. Philosophy. Atheism. Science. Politics |
Sam Harris
Paperback | Pages: 348 pages Rating: 3.93 | 32333 Users | 1625 Reviews
Description To Books The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
In The End of Faith, Sam Harris delivers a startling analysis of the clash between reason and religion in the modern world. He offers a vivid, historical tour of our willingness to suspend reason in favor of religious beliefs—even when these beliefs inspire the worst human atrocities. While warning against the encroachment of organized religion into world politics, Harris draws on insights from neuroscience, philosophy, and Eastern mysticism to deliver a call for a truly modern foundation for ethics and spirituality that is both secular and humanistic.Winner of the 2005 PEN/Martha Albrand Award for Nonfiction.

Particularize Books In Favor Of The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
Original Title: | The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason |
ISBN: | 0393327655 (ISBN13: 9780393327656) |
Edition Language: | English URL http://www.samharris.org |
Characters: | Condoleezza Rice, Noam Chomsky, Christopher Hitchens, Fareed Zakaria |
Literary Awards: | PEN/Martha Albrand Award for First Nonfiction Writers (2005) |
Rating Epithetical Books The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
Ratings: 3.93 From 32333 Users | 1625 ReviewsColumn Epithetical Books The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
While covering much the same ground as Christopher Hitchens in God Is Not Great, Harris does so with a voice less harsh, one sounding less like a diatribe. He scope is wider than Hitchens allowing him to make points that Hitchens doesnt as well, e.g. that the tolerant religious are so at the expense of their belief in the dogma of their own faith(s). The 2005 paperback edition includes an Afterword in which the author speaks to some of the earlier criticism of this title, whether the criticismI rate this a five in spite of some legitimate reservations, too well expressed by too many people to bear repeating here. The things I liked: 1. Brilliant writing style. Incisive, funny, powerful. (His followup to this book, a 94 page tract called "Letter to a Christian Nation" displays this skill to even better advantage.)2. Sam's recommended actions for the reader. Religion generally gets a free pass to make unsubstantiated truth claims. Stop allowing that. Start questioning, and pushing back
While religious belief is an incredibly complex subject with ages of history behind it, the motivation for such belief can be roughly summarized as a preoccupation with, and fear of, what happens to us when we, as mortal human beings, die. Let's face it, it is a frightening and dreary concept; to think that when our time comes, that that's it, nothing more, our bodies decompose, and our minds no longer function. Of course this is the case for people of the scientific, or materialist persuasion.

Harris can pen a clever turn of phrase. Unfortunately, that's most of what he has going for him. The old standby "What's good isn't new and what's new isn't good" very much applies here.It's funny how much Harris and I agree on the fundamental issues -- we are both atheists and we both believe that religion can and has done great harm -- yet I found little of value in this work of atheist apologetics. History, politics, and culture are grossly distorted in service of Harris' arguments. The prime
Harris does much to prove that there is nothing one can say about religion that will not get you into trouble. In Letter to a Christian Nation he is criticised for not dealing with moderates, but that is done here. I find the religious tend to want it all ways. If you criticise those who actually believe the word of god as if it was real and meant, then you are being as dogmatic as they are. Here Harris argues that moderate believers are as dangerous as fundamentalists as by stopping debate on
A book about the dangers of religion. In a well-reasoned way, Sam Harris explains why religion and tolerance to religion is harmful to mankind. The book starts with a description of the last day of a suicide bomber. Further in the first chapter he opposes respect and tolerance for all religions as they are all based on no evidence and on the other hand can lead to various harmful results (violence, ignorance, waste of lives for non violent reasons and more)He challenges the issue of religious
I found Sam Harris's book interesting and disturbing, but it should be classified as fiction. Nearly every argument he asserts is specious. Apparently, he reads only those who support his own position (philosophical suicide). He conveniently dismisses atheistic regimes as "religious" by assigning an ambiguous religious or mythological type of totalitarianism to Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and the rest of those who tortured and killed religious believers. He cites Northern Ireland and the
0 Comments