Download Free Books Salem's Lot Full Version

Be Specific About Based On Books Salem's Lot

Title	:	Salem's Lot
Author	:	Stephen King
Book Format	:	Paperback
Book Edition	:	17th Impression
Pages	:	Pages: 483 pages
Published	:	1991 by New English Library (first published October 17th 1975)
Categories	:	Thriller. Fiction. Mystery. Crime. Suspense. Action. Mystery Thriller

Salem's Lot

Stephen King

Paperback | Pages: 483 pages

Rating: 4.02 | 312563 Users | 9217 Reviews

Ilustration Conducive To Books Salem's Lot

so i DID like this, and i don’t really have anything cool or fun to say about it for a review. but i just realized that i forgot to mention the boob euphemism of choice for this book was JAHOOBIES. i just wanted you all to know that....ok bye

Details Books Supposing Salem's Lot

Original Title:	'Salem's Lot
ISBN:	0450031063 (ISBN13: 9780450031069)
Edition Language:	English
Characters:	Benjamin Mears, Susan Norton, Matt Burke, Mark Petrie, Father Donald Callahan, Mike Ryerson, Dr James Cody, Richard Throckett Straker, Danny Glick, Larry Crockett, Sonny James, Charles Boone, Loretta Starcher, Weasel Craig, Larry McLeod, Joe Crane, June Petrie, Hal Griffen, Dud Rogers, Cynthia Stowens, Buddy Bascomb, Nolly Gardener, Tookey, Miss Coogan, Royal Snow, Harriet Durham
Setting:	Jerusalem's Lot, Maine(United States)
Literary Awards:	World Fantasy Award Nominee for Best Novel (1976)

Rating Based On Books Salem's Lot

Ratings: 4.02 From 312563 Users | 9217 Reviews

Weigh Up Based On Books Salem's Lot

Maybe the greatest vampire novel of all time. Certainly one of the scariest stories I've ever read. I loved everything about this book. The audio version is also excellent, narrated by Ron McClarty. The best vampire book since SALEM'S LOT would have to be by Michael Rowe.

Salems Lot by Stephen King is a 2011 Anchor Books publication. (Originally published in 1975)I read a decent amount of horror novels when I was a teenager. My first introduction to Stephen King was with Carrie. But it was the heyday of pulp horror novels, with lots of books to choose from out there and long story short, I never got around to reading this book until the early eighties. I had read other King books by that time, and if memory serves, Id watched the made for TV movie before I read

'Salem's Lot is my favorite Stephen King novel . Granted I haven't read every book he's put out . I read it the first time in the late 70's or early 80's . Ouch that was a long time ago . Overall I've reread it 4 or 5 times so it's a guilty pleasure of mine . I feel another reread coming on .

This is the greatest vampire novel ever written. Forget Stoker, ignore Rice, this is it. Why? Because the vampires herein are not your friends. They are not your lovers. There is nothing remotely lovable about Barlow's children of the night. They simply want to fucking drain you. (view spoiler)[Like many people, my first experience with 'Salem's Lot had to do with Tobe Hooper's amazing made-for-television adaptation. The mute Nosferatu-like Barlow of Hooper's version is nothing like the

I love reading books multiple times because each time I read it I feel completely different about it. I find new things I missed, I view things from a different perspective. Each time its like reading a new book. I first read Salem's Lot when I was a teenager, I liked it but I didn't fully appreciate it. Salem's Lot is a vampire novel but its so much more than that. Salem's Lot is about small town America and the disintegrating social fabric. One of the things I've come to appreciate most about

I dont read a lot of horror, so its taken me a bit longer than most to recognize the genius of Stephen King. Belated as it might be, I am finally making my way through his surprisingly versatile oeuvre. At this point, I think Ive skimmed off much of the cream, having read several of his undisputed classics (The Stand, It, Pet Sematery, etc). Now Im ready to bore down into the second level. Salems Lot is definitely a step down from Kings best, most enduring novels. That being said, horror done by

The last time I picked up a King novel, my inclination towards critical analysis of a text was still just a budding obsession. Now it is an enduring preoccupation. Try as I may, I cannot overlook the subtle slips in King's plot arrangement and characterization any more - the inevitability of women being cast in the molds of the lover or the victim of abuse or the tactless ingenue is a veritable threat to my fangirlism. (This is not to mention the tropes of the 'magical negro' and other assorted